Real World Assets (RWAs) are bridging the $400 trillion traditional finance market with DeFi. Tokenized US Treasuries now yield 5%+ on-chain. Corporate credit protocols offer 8-12% APY. Real estate, invoices, and carbon credits are being tokenized and traded 24/7. RWAs represent DeFi's path to sustainable yield backed by real-world cash flows.
This guide covers what RWAs are, the major protocols tokenizing them, how to access RWA yields, and the unique risks of bringing traditional finance on-chain. Whether you're seeking stable yields or diversifying beyond crypto-native assets, understanding RWAs is increasingly essential.
📑 What You'll Learn
- • What Real World Assets (RWAs) are and why they matter
- • Categories of tokenized RWAs
- • Major RWA protocols and how to access them
- • Yield comparison: RWA vs crypto-native strategies
- • Risks specific to RWA investments
- • The future of RWAs in DeFi
What Are Real World Assets?
Real World Assets are traditional financial instruments—bonds, loans, real estate, commodities—tokenized and brought on-chain. The token represents ownership or exposure to the underlying asset, enabling permissionless access to yields previously limited to institutions.
Why RWAs Matter for DeFi
Sustainable Yield: Crypto-native yields often come from token emissions (unsustainable) or trading fees (volatile). RWA yields come from real-world interest payments, rents, and cash flows—more predictable and sustainable.
Diversification: RWA yields often correlate with traditional finance, not crypto. When crypto crashes, your tokenized Treasury is still paying 5%.
Scale: Traditional finance is $400+ trillion. DeFi is ~$50 billion. RWAs tap into a market orders of magnitude larger than crypto-native opportunities.
Regulatory Path: Tokenizing regulated assets creates a bridge for institutions uncomfortable with purely crypto instruments.
The RWA Tokenization Process
1. Acquire underlying asset: Protocol buys T-bills, makes loans, etc.
2. Create legal structure: SPV, trust, or legal wrapper holds assets
3. Mint tokens: Tokens represent claims on the underlying
4. Distribute yield: Interest/returns flow to token holders
5. Redemption: Tokens can be burned to redeem underlying value
💡 Key Insight
RWAs reintroduce counterparty risk that pure DeFi eliminates. When you hold a Treasury token, you're trusting the issuer to actually hold Treasuries and honor redemptions. This isn't necessarily bad—it's a trade-off for accessing real-world yields on-chain.
Categories of Tokenized RWAs
1. Tokenized Treasuries
US Treasury bills and bonds, tokenized for on-chain access. Currently the largest RWA category with $2B+ tokenized.
Yield: 4.5-5.5% (tracks Fed funds rate)
Risk: Very low (US government backing)
Liquidity: High (large markets, frequent redemption)
Providers: Ondo (OUSG), Mountain (USDM), Franklin Templeton
Use Case: Risk-free rate on-chain. Hold stablecoins that earn Treasury yields instead of 0%.
2. Private Credit / Corporate Loans
Loans to real businesses—fintech companies, crypto market makers, emerging market firms.
Yield: 8-15% APY
Risk: Medium-High (credit/default risk)
Liquidity: Low-Medium (loan maturity periods)
Providers: Maple Finance, Goldfinch, Centrifuge
Use Case: Higher yields for those willing to take credit risk. Access to institutional lending returns.
3. Real Estate
Fractional ownership of property, rental income, or real estate debt.
Yield: 6-12% (rental income + appreciation)
Risk: Medium (property/market specific)
Liquidity: Low (real estate is illiquid)
Providers: RealT, Lofty, Parcl
Use Case: Real estate exposure without large capital requirements or property management.
4. Invoice Financing / Trade Finance
Short-term loans against business invoices and trade receivables.
Yield: 8-12% APY
Risk: Medium (debtor default risk)
Liquidity: Medium (short-term loans, 30-90 days)
Providers: Centrifuge, Goldfinch
Use Case: Short-duration, higher-yield alternative to stablecoin lending.
Interactive: RWA Yield Calculator
Compare yields across different RWA protocols and see projected returns for your investment size.
Min Investment: $5,000 • US-restricted
Monthly Yield
$217
Annual Yield
$2,600
vs T-Bills (>5%)
+0.2%
Risk Considerations
- • US Treasuries carry moderate credit/default risk
- • high liquidity means possible early exit
- • Smart contract risk on top of underlying asset risk
- • Regulatory uncertainty for tokenized real-world assets
RWA yields correlate with traditional finance rates. When Fed rates are high, T-bill tokenizers offer attractive risk-adjusted returns. When rates drop, look to higher-yield corporate lending protocols—but size positions for the additional risk.
Major RWA Protocols
Ondo Finance
Leading tokenized Treasury provider. OUSG (short-term Treasuries) and USDY (yield-bearing stablecoin) are among the most adopted RWA tokens.
Products: OUSG (5%+ yield), USDY (yield-bearing USD)
Access: US-restricted for OUSG; USDY more accessible
Minimum: $5,000 for direct minting; secondary markets for smaller amounts
Maple Finance
Institutional lending protocol. Facilitates loans to crypto-native institutions and fintech companies. Experienced defaults but restructured with improved underwriting.
Yield: 8-12% on various pools
Risk: Credit risk on borrowers
Access: Permissionless deposits to lending pools
Goldfinch
Emerging market credit protocol. Funds loans to fintech lenders in developing economies—higher risk, higher reward.
Yield: 10-15%+ on senior/junior tranches
Risk: Higher (emerging market credit, currency risk)
Access: Permissionless, low minimums
Centrifuge
Infrastructure for tokenizing any real-world asset. Powers pools for invoice financing, real estate, and more. Tinlake is their main lending interface.
Yield: Varies by pool (8-12% typical)
Risk: Pool-specific (review underlying assets)
Access: Pool-specific requirements
MakerDAO (RWA Vaults)
DAI's stability partially backed by RWAs. MakerDAO has deployed billions into Treasuries, loans, and structured credit—all backing the DAI stablecoin.
Yield: Indirectly via DSR (DAI Savings Rate) at 5%
Access: Hold DAI and deposit to DSR
RWA Yield vs Crypto-Native Yield
| Source | Yield | Risk | Sustainability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokenized Treasuries | 5% | Very Low | Sustainable (Fed rate) |
| Stablecoin Lending (DeFi) | 5-8% | Low-Medium | Variable (demand) |
| RWA Private Credit | 8-15% | Medium-High | Sustainable (interest) |
| LP Farming (volatile pairs) | 10-50% | High | Variable (emissions) |
| Yield Farming (incentives) | 20-100% | Very High | Unsustainable |
RWA yields are lower than peak DeFi farming but more sustainable. They derive from real economic activity, not token inflation. This makes them attractive for capital preservation and consistent income.
🎯 Strategic Use of RWAs
Use RWAs for your "safe" allocation—the portion you can't afford to lose. Use crypto-native strategies for the portion where you're seeking asymmetric upside and can tolerate higher risk.
RWA-Specific Risks
Counterparty Risk
Unlike pure DeFi, RWAs require trusting issuers to actually hold and manage the underlying assets. If Ondo disappeared, could you redeem your OUSG? Due diligence on issuers matters.
Regulatory Risk
Tokenized securities may be subject to securities laws. Regulations are evolving and unclear. US users face particular restrictions. Some protocols may become inaccessible.
Liquidity Risk
Real-world assets are inherently less liquid than crypto. Redemption may have delays or gates. In crisis scenarios, you may not be able to exit quickly.
Credit/Default Risk
For lending protocols, borrowers can default. Maple and Goldfinch have both experienced defaults. Higher yields = higher default probability.
Smart Contract + Traditional Risk
RWAs have both smart contract risk AND traditional asset risk. You're adding layers, not replacing them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are RWA tokens securities?
Often yes, under most regulatory frameworks. Many RWA tokens are explicitly offered as securities with KYC/accreditation requirements. Others structure around this, but regulatory status is uncertain. Assume you're buying something regulators may scrutinize.
Can US residents access RWA yields?
It depends on the product. Some (like Ondo's OUSG) require accreditation or are US-restricted. Others (like DAI's DSR) are permissionless. Check each protocol's terms. Being non-US significantly expands options.
What happens if the issuer goes bankrupt?
This is the key counterparty risk question. Well-structured RWAs use bankruptcy-remote SPVs where assets are legally separated. Review the legal structure. If assets are truly segregated, you have a claim on them. If not, you're an unsecured creditor.
How do RWA yields compare when Fed rates drop?
Treasury yields track Fed rates—if rates drop, so do yields. Private credit yields are stickier but will also adjust. RWA yields are attractive now because traditional rates are high. In a low-rate environment, the yield premium may be smaller.
Should I diversify across RWA protocols?
Yes. Issuer/counterparty risk is real. Spreading across Ondo, Maple, Goldfinch, etc., reduces single-point-of-failure risk. Different underlying assets (Treasuries vs corporate credit) also provide diversification.
Continue Learning
Conclusion: RWAs as DeFi's Bridge to TradFi
Real World Assets represent DeFi's most significant bridge to traditional finance. They offer sustainable yields backed by real cash flows, diversification away from crypto volatility, and a path for institutional capital to enter the space.
The trade-off is accepting counterparty risk and regulatory uncertainty that pure DeFi avoids. But for many investors, that trade-off is worth making—especially for the "safe" portion of a portfolio that prioritizes preservation over moonshots.
As traditional finance increasingly adopts blockchain rails, RWAs will only grow. Understanding them now positions you ahead of the curve as the boundaries between DeFi and TradFi continue to blur.