Before you enter any trade, you need three numbers:
- Account size — Your total trading capital
- Risk per trade — The percentage of capital you're willing to lose (typically
1-2%)
- Trade risk — The distance from entry to stop loss
The crypto position sizing formula:
Position Size = (Account Size × Risk Per Trade) ÷ Trade Risk
Let's work through a real example:
- Account size: $25,000
- Risk per trade: 2%
- Entry price: $3,200 (ETH)
- Stop loss: $3,040
- Trade risk per unit: $160
Position Size = ($25,000 × 0.02) ÷ $160 = 3.125 ETH
So you buy 3.125 ETH (worth $10,000 at entry). If your stop hits at $3,040, you lose exactly $500—2% of your account.
This formula ensures every trade risks the same percentage of your account, regardless of:
It removes emotion from sizing decisions completely.
Many traders think backwards: they decide how much to buy first, then set a stop loss based on what loss they can stomach.
This approach fails because it doesn't account for where the stop loss actually belongs. Your stop should be at the point where your trade thesis is invalidated—not at the point where you've lost "enough."
If you buy ETH at $3,200 and the logical stop (below support) is at $3,000, that's a $200 risk per unit. If you decide you only want to risk $100 per unit and put your stop at $3,100, you'll get stopped out by normal volatility before the move happens.
The right approach:
- Identify the trade setup using your technical analysis
- Determine where your stop loss must be based on market structure
- Calculate position size based on that stop distance
- If the resulting position is too small to be worthwhile, skip the trade
Never compromise your stop loss placement to fit a predetermined position size. Use our position size calculator to get this right every time.
Before every trade, follow this workflow:
- Identify the setup — What's the pattern or signal?
- Determine entry price — Where exactly will you enter?
- Set stop loss based on technicals — Where is the trade invalidated?
- Calculate trade risk — Entry price minus stop loss
- Apply the formula — Get exact position size
- Verify position value — Does it fit your account?
- Check portfolio exposure — What's total risk across all positions?
- Execute — Enter with confidence
This systematic approach removes guesswork and ensures consistent trading.
Calculate your position size instantly. Stop doing the math manually—our free position size calculator gives you exact sizing in seconds.
Fixed fractional is the most common and straightforward position sizing method. You risk a fixed percentage of your current account on every trade. This is often called the 1% rule or2% rule in crypto trading.
- Pick your risk percentage (commonly 1-2%)
- Apply the position sizing formula
- Recalculate for every trade based on current account balance
The beauty of fixed fractional is that it naturally adjusts to your account size:
- When winning: Account grows, so absolute position sizes increase
- When losing: Account shrinks, so absolute position sizes decrease
This creates a natural "gas and brake" mechanism. You lean into winning streaks and pull back during losing streaks automatically. This is one of the key principles taught in professional trading courses.
| Experience Level |
Recommended Risk |
Notes |
| Beginner (<50 trades) |
0.5-1% |
Focus on learning, not earning |
| Intermediate (50-200 trades) |
1-1.5% |
Proven some consistency |
| Advanced (200+ profitable trades) |
1.5-2% |
Clear edge documented |
| Professional |
2-3% on best setups |
Deep experience, full-time focus |
Most traders overestimate their skill and underestimate the frequency of losing streaks. When in doubt, go smaller. This is fundamental trading discipline, and it's what separates profitable traders from the majority who fail.
Here's why 1-2% is the sweet spot for how much to risk per crypto trade:
- 10 consecutive losses = 9.6% account drawdown
- 20 consecutive losses = 18.2% account drawdown
- Virtually impossible to blow up from normal trading
- 10 consecutive losses = 18.3% account drawdown
- 20 consecutive losses = 33.2% account drawdown
- Recoverable but painful
- 10 consecutive losses = 40.1% account drawdown
- 20 consecutive losses = 64.2% account drawdown
- Psychological breaking point for most traders
- 10 consecutive losses = 65.1% account drawdown
- Account effectively destroyed after inevitable bad streak
The 1% rule crypto traders follow exists because the math is unforgiving. Small position sizes compound over time; large position sizes lead to ruin. Understanding this math is essential for building a profitable trading system.
- You have a proven edge
- Normal market conditions
- Standard setups
- Most of your trades
The Kelly Criterion is a mathematical formula that calculates the theoretically optimal bet size to maximize long-term growth. It was developed for gambling but applies perfectly to systematic trading.
Kelly % = W - [(1 - W) / R]
Where:
- W = Win rate (as a decimal)
- R = Win/loss ratio (average win ÷ average loss)
Let's say your trading journal data shows:
- Win rate: 55% (W = 0.55)
- Average win: $300
- Average loss: $200
- Win/loss ratio: 1.5 (R = 1.5)
Kelly % = 0.55 - [(1 - 0.55) / 1.5]Kelly % = 0.55 - [0.45 / 1.5]Kelly % = 0.55 - 0.30Kelly % = 0.25 or 25%
The Kelly Criterion tells you to risk 25% of your account on each trade with these stats. But there's a massive problem: Kelly assumes your historical statistics perfectly predict future results.
They don't.
Market conditions change. Your win rate fluctuates. A strategy that worked last month might not work next month. Full Kelly also produces enormous volatility—even when profitable, you'll experience gut-wrenching drawdowns.
Most professional traders use Half Kelly or Quarter Kelly:
- Half Kelly = Kelly % ÷ 2
- Quarter Kelly = Kelly % ÷ 4
Using our example:
- Full Kelly: 25% risk
- Half Kelly: 12.5% risk
- Quarter Kelly: 6.25% risk
Even Half Kelly is aggressive for crypto. A more practical application is to use Kelly as a ceiling—never risk more than your Kelly calculation suggests, even on your best setups. Many AI trading systems incorporate Kelly-based position sizing automatically.
Kelly is most valuable when:
For discretionary traders or those with limited data, stick to fixed fractional until you have enough history to calculate meaningful Kelly values.
If you trade multiple strategies, calculate Kelly separately for each:
Then allocate capital to each strategy based on its Kelly-suggested sizing and your confidence in each edge.
Track your win rate automatically. Kelly Criterion requires accurate data. Thrive's AI-powered journal tracks your stats automatically—no manual logging. Start tracking free →
Fixed fractional and Kelly size positions based on your account and historical performance. Volatility-based sizing adds another dimension: the current behavior of the asset itself.
Different assets have different volatility profiles. A 2% stop works very differently on Bitcoin (daily moves of 3-5%) versus a small-cap altcoin (daily moves of 10-20%).
ATR measures an asset's average price movement over a period (typically 14 days). You can use it to normalize position sizes across assets with different volatility—this is called volatility adjusted position sizing.
ATR-Based Position Size = (Account × Risk %) ÷ (N × ATR)
Where N is your chosen ATR multiple (typically 1.5-3).
- Account: $50,000
- Risk per trade: 2% ($1,000)
- ETH 14-day ATR: $150
- ATR multiple: 2
Position Size = $1,000 ÷ (2 × $150) = $1,000 ÷ $300 = 3.33 ETH
- Account: $50,000
- Risk per trade: 2% ($1,000)
- Altcoin 14-day ATR: $0.50 (price $5)
- ATR multiple: 2
Position Size = $1,000 ÷ (2 × $0.50) = $1,000 ÷ $1 = 1,000 tokens
The beauty of this approach: your stop loss is always 2× ATR from entry, and your dollar risk is always 2% of account. The position size automatically adjusts to match the volatility of whatever you're trading.
Professional crypto funds and institutional traders typically use ATR-based sizing as their primary method because it adapts automatically to changing market conditions.
Pro tip: Thrive displays real-time ATR values on every chart, so you never have to calculate volatility manually. See it in action →
- Consistent dollar risk across different assets
- Automatic adjustment when volatility expands or contracts
- Fewer stopped-out trades from setting stops too tight
- Better sleep knowing your stops account for normal price movement
- Natural position size reduction during high-volatility periods—AI volatility prediction can enhance this further
-
Keltner Channel Stop:
Instead of raw ATR, use ATR around a moving average. This adapts to both trend and volatility.
-
Multi-Period ATR:
Compare 7-day ATR to 21-day ATR. When short-term ATR is higher, volatility is expanding—use wider stops. When lower, volatility is contracting.
-
Regime-Based ATR:
Categorize market regimes (trending, ranging, volatile) and use different ATR multiples for each. AI market prediction models can help identify these regimes automatically.
-
Related guides: Bollinger Bands Trading Strategies • MACD Trading Strategies
One of the most overlooked aspects of position sizing is adapting to changing market conditions. The same position sizing approach that works in a trending bull market can devastate your account in a choppy, ranging environment.
During confirmed bull markets (on-chain metrics bullish, smart money accumulating):
- Can use full 2% risk on trend-following setups
- Reduce size on counter-trend trades to 0.5%
- Scale into positions on pullbacks
- Let winners run with trailing stops
During bear markets or downtrends:
- Drop to 0.5-1% maximum risk
- Consider sitting out entirely during panic phases
- If shorting, still use reduced size—bear market rallies are violent
- Cash is a position—capital preservation matters most
When markets are consolidating without clear direction:
- Range width (wider range = larger potential moves)
- Time in range (longer = higher probability breakout coming)
- Volume patterns within range
- Use 1% risk for range-bound strategies
- Reduce size near range edges (breakout risk)
- Have plan for false breakouts
- Consider mean reversion strategies with tighter stops
During major events (FOMC, CPI, Bitcoin halving, exchange hacks):
- Cutting position sizes by 50-75%
- Closing speculative positions before events
- Widening stops to avoid stop hunts
- Using options for defined risk (if available)
Event-specific adjustments:
| Event Type |
Size Adjustment |
Rationale |
| Scheduled macro |
-50% |
Can gap through stops |
| Unscheduled crisis |
Close or -75% |
Uncertainty too high |
| Token-specific news |
-25% on that asset |
Increased volatility |
| Market structure shifts |
Reassess entirely |
May need new approach |
| Whale movements |
Watch and reduce |
AI whale tracking helps identify repositioning |
Your position sizing should match your trading style. What works for a scalper will destroy a position trader, and vice versa.
Scalpers take many small trades throughout the day, aiming for small but consistent gains. AI scalping and swing trading strategies can help optimize position sizing for each style.
- High frequency (10-50+ trades per day)
- Small profit targets (0.1-0.5%)
- Tight stops (0.1-0.3%)
- Need high win rate (60%+)
- Requires advanced order flow reading
- Use 0.25-0.5% risk per trade (due to frequency)
- Maximum 3-5 open positions
- Total daily risk cap: 2-3%
- Stops can be tighter due to lower timeframe precision
- Account: $50,000
- Risk per scalp: 0.5% ($250)
- 20-tick stop in ES futures = very small position
- But if you take 10 trades, that's 5% daily risk capacity
Day traders take fewer trades but hold for hours, closing by end of day.
- Moderate frequency (1-10 trades per day)
- Medium profit targets (0.5-2%)
- Medium stops (0.5-1.5%)
- Win rate varies by strategy
- Use 1-2% risk per trade
- Maximum 3 positions simultaneously
- Consider correlation between open positions
- Reduce size in last hour (market close dynamics)
Swing traders hold positions for days to weeks, capturing larger moves.
- Low frequency (2-8 trades per week)
- Larger profit targets (5-20%)
- Wider stops (3-10%)
- Can accept lower win rate with better R:R
- Uses daily and weekly chart patterns
- Use 1-2% risk per trade
- Account for overnight/weekend gaps
- Use ATR-based stops (2-3x ATR)
- Scale out at profit targets
Position traders hold for weeks to months, trading macro moves and market cycles.
- Very low frequency (1-4 trades per month)
- Large profit targets (20-100%+)
- Wide stops (10-25%)
- Win rate can be lower with excellent R:R
When you hold multiple positions simultaneously, your total portfolio risk is NOT simply the sum of individual position risks—unless those positions are completely uncorrelated. In crypto, they rarely are.
Most cryptocurrencies are highly correlated with Bitcoin. When BTC drops 10%, most alts drop 10-30%. This means that multiple "2% risk" positions can become one massive correlated bet.
- BTC/ETH: 0.85-0.95 (very high)
- BTC/Large caps (SOL, ADA): 0.75-0.90
- BTC/Mid caps: 0.60-0.80
- BTC/Small caps: 0.50-0.70
- BTC/Stablecoins: ~0 (by design)
Adjusted Risk = Individual Risk × √(1 + (n-1) × average correlation)
Where n = number of correlated positions
- 5 altcoin longs, each at 2% risk
- Average correlation with each other: 0.7
- Naive total risk: 10%
- Adjusted risk: 2% × √(1 + 4 × 0.7) = 2% × √3.8 = 2% × 1.95 = 3.9% per position effective risk
- True portfolio risk: Closer to 20% than 10%
Rule of thumb for position sizing for altcoins:
| Portfolio Composition |
Max Total Risk |
Per-Position Max |
| All BTC/ETH |
6% |
2% |
| BTC/ETH + 2-3 large caps |
8% |
2% |
| Mixed portfolio (5+ assets) |
10% |
1.5% |
| Highly correlated alts only |
4% |
1% |
- Strategies to manage correlation:
- Limit total number of directional positions (max 5)
- Include uncorrelated assets (stables, inverse positions)
- Size down individual positions when holding multiples
- Use portfolio rebalancing to maintain targets
- Track correlation actively with trading analytics
- Consider sector rotation timing
Beyond individual asset correlation, consider sector exposure:
| Sector |
Example Tokens |
Notes |
| L1s |
ETH, SOL, AVAX |
Highly correlated |
| DeFi |
UNI, AAVE, CRV |
Correlated, extra protocol risk |
| L2s |
ARB, OP, MATIC |
Correlated with ETH |
| Memecoins |
DOGE, SHIB, PEPE |
Highly correlated, extra volatile |
| AI Tokens |
FET, RNDR, AGIX |
Emerging correlation patterns |
Treat same-sector positions as partially overlapping bets when sizing. Use on-chain data to monitor sector flows.
Leverage changes the position sizing equation significantly. Many traders get this wrong and end up with far more risk than intended. Understanding position sizing leverage trading is critical for survival.
- Account: $10,000
- Risk 2%: $200
- Buy $5,000 worth of BTC
- 4% move against you = $200 loss (2% of account) ✓
- Account: $10,000
- Risk 2%: $200
- Control $50,000 worth of BTC with $5,000 margin
- 0.4% move against you = $200 loss (2% of account) ✓
- But a 2% move against you = $1,000 loss (10% of account) ✗
If you use leverage but don't adjust position size, your effective risk multiplies by the leverage factor.
The formula remains the same, but you must account for leverage in your trade risk calculation. Use our liquidation price calculator to verify.
Margin Required = Position Size ÷ Leverage
Example:
- Account: $10,000
- Max risk: 2% ($200)
- Entry: $70,000 BTC
- Stop loss: $69,000 (1.43% move)
- Leverage: 10x
Position Size = $200 ÷ $1,000 (stop distance) = 0.2 BTC = $14,000 notional
Margin required = $14,000 ÷ 10 = $1,400
So you'd use $1,400 margin at 10x leverage to control 0.2 BTC. If your stop hits, you lose $200—exactly 2% of your account.
| Strategy Type |
Maximum Leverage |
Notes |
| Swing trades (days to weeks) |
2-3x |
Need room for overnight moves |
| Day trades (hours) |
3-5x |
Can monitor positions closely |
| Scalps (minutes) |
5-10x |
Very short exposure window |
| Avoid |
20x+ |
Unless you're literally a market maker |
Higher leverage isn't "free money"—it's tighter liquidation risk and less room for error.
Beyond your stop loss, you must consider liquidation price:
Liquidation Price ≈ Entry ± (Entry / Leverage) × Maintenance Margin Factor
For 10x leverage with 1% maintenance margin:
- Long entry at $70,000
- Liquidation around $63,700 (roughly 9% below entry)
If your stop is at $69,000 but exchange has issues or market gaps, you could get liquidated at much worse prices. Always keep significant buffer between stop and liquidation.
Perpetual swaps have additional considerations:
- Funding rates — Can add or subtract from position P&L
- Open interest — High OI = potential for squeezes
- Insurance fund — Protection against socialized losses
- Cross vs isolated margin — Affects liquidation calculations
Size perpetual positions with these factors in mind, especially for longer holding periods. Consider using AI trading bots that can automatically adjust position sizing based on these factors.
Know your liquidation price before you trade. Our free liquidation calculator shows exactly where you'll get liquidated at any leverage level.
DeFi trading introduces unique considerations that don't exist in centralized exchange trading. Slippage, gas costs, MEV, and smart contract risk all affect optimal position sizing.
1. Slippage on DEXs — Unlike CEXs with order books, DEX trades use AMMs where large orders move price significantly.
| Position Size |
Typical Slippage (liquid pair) |
Slippage (illiquid pair) |
| $1,000 |
0.1-0.3% |
0.5-2% |
| $10,000 |
0.3-1% |
2-10% |
| $100,000 |
1-3% |
10-50%+ |
- Rule: Never trade more than 1% of pool liquidity in a single transaction.
2. Gas Costs — Gas costs are fixed regardless of position size, creating a minimum viable trade size.
Example on Ethereum mainnet (20 gwei, ETH at $3,000):
- Typical swap: $15-30 in gas
- Complex DeFi action: $50-100+
If gas is $25 and your target profit is 5%, you need at least a $500 position to break even on gas alone.
- Minimum position calculation:
Minimum Position = Gas Cost / (Target Profit % × 2)
For $25 gas and 5% target: $25 / (0.05 × 2) = $250 minimum
3. MEV and Sandwich Attacks — MEV bots can extract value from your trades, especially large ones on public mempools.
- Use private mempools (Flashbots, MEV Blocker)
- Set tight slippage tolerance
- Split large orders across time
- Use MEV-protected DEXs
- Monitor memecoin trading for high-slippage lessons
For DeFi trading, adjust standard position sizing:
- Calculate standard position size using the universal formula
- Subtract expected slippage from profit target
- Subtract gas costs from expected profit
- Verify position > minimum viable size
- Check liquidity — ensure < 1% of pool
- Consider MEV — split if position is large
- Account: $20,000
- Risk per trade: 2% ($400)
- Entry: $100 token price
- Stop: $95 (-5%)
- Standard position: $400 / $5 = 80 tokens = $8,000
- Slippage estimate: 0.5% = $40
- Gas cost: $25
- Effective risk: $400 + $40 + $25 = $465
- Adjusted position: Keep at 80 tokens but account for higher break-even
For yield farming and liquidity provision, sizing must account for unique risks that don't exist in spot trading. Understanding stablecoin yield strategies is a good starting point.
- Key DeFi risks to size for:
- Impermanent loss — Your real risk in LP positions
- APY assumptions — Often inflated or unsustainable
- Smart contract risk — Protocol could be hacked
- Token emission dilution — Reward tokens may decline in value
If providing liquidity to a volatile pair, assume maximum 25-30% IL in extreme moves. Size so this IL + worst-case fee earnings still leaves you profitable.
Sometimes entering your full position at once isn't optimal. Scaling—building or reducing positions gradually—can improve average entry price and reduce timing risk.
Instead of entering your full 3 ETH position at once, you might:
- Buy 1 ETH at $3,200
- Buy 1 ETH at $3,150 if price pulls back
- Buy 1 ETH at $3,100 if price pulls back further
- Better average entry if price pulls back
- Reduced timing pressure
- Can test the trade with smaller size first
- Psychological comfort building conviction
-
Might miss the move entirely if price goes immediately
-
More complex execution
-
Can lead to averaging into losing trades (dangerous)
-
Key rule: Only scale in if price moves in your favor or holds at a predetermined level. Never scale into a losing position without a clear thesis for why this time is different. This is a common mistake covered in why traders fail.
When planning to scale in, your total risk across all entries must still equal your intended position risk.
- Intended total position: $9,000
- Total risk: 2% of $50,000 = $1,000
- Stop loss: $3,000 (from $3,200 entry = $200 per ETH risk)
- Full position at risk: 5 ETH
- Entry 1: 2 ETH at $3,200 ($400 risk if stop hit from here)
- Entry 2: 2 ETH at $3,100 (improves average to $3,150)
- Entry 3: 1 ETH at $3,000 (final add at support)
Total: 5 ETH, average entry ~$3,140, stop at $2,950 = $950 risk ≈ 2%
Scaling out means selling portions of your position at different prices:
- Sell 1/3 at 2:1 risk/reward
- Sell 1/3 at 3:1 risk/reward
- Let final 1/3 run with trailing stop
- Locks in some profit even if the full target isn't reached
- Reduces psychological pressure of "letting winners run"
- Captures more upside on extended moves
- Creates free trade scenario
- Reduces overall profit if full target is hit
- More complex to track and execute
- Can lead to premature profit-taking
- 50% at 1:1 R:R (breakeven stop)
- 50% at 2:1 R:R
- 25% at 2:1 R:R
- 25% at 3:1 R:R
- 50% trail with moving average or ATR stop
- 33% at 2:1 R:R
- 33% at structural resistance
- 34% trail until trend breaks
For most traders, especially beginners:
- Enter full position at once (simpler, avoids averaging down mistakes)
- Scale out in portions (locks in gains, psychologically easier)
As you gain experience and discipline, scaling in can improve results—but it requires iron-clad rules about when to add and when to cut. Document your scaling rules in your trading plan.
Position sizing looks different depending on whether you're trading a $1,000 account or a $1,000,000 account. The math is the same, but practical constraints differ significantly.
Challenges:
- 1% of $5,000 is $50—after fees and slippage, potential profit might not be worth the effort
- Minimum position sizes on exchanges may force you to risk more than planned
- Can't properly diversify across assets
- Fees eat larger percentage of profits
- Accept that you may need to risk 2-3% to have meaningful trades
- Trade assets with smaller minimum sizes
- Focus on building the account through consistent growth
- Consider paper trading until account is larger
- Use exchanges with lower fees
Realistic expectations:
| Account Size |
1% Risk |
2% Risk |
Practical Minimum Trade |
| $1,000 |
$10 |
$20 |
$20-50 risk to cover fees |
| $2,500 |
$25 |
$50 |
$25-50 risk |
| $5,000 |
$50 |
$100 |
Standard rules apply |
- Accounts $5,000 - $100,000:
This is the sweet spot where standard position sizing works well. 1% risk gives meaningful position sizes, fees are proportionally small, and you have flexibility.
- Stick to 1% risk as your baseline
- Scale down to 0.5% during drawdowns or uncertain periods
- Scale up to 2% only for highest-conviction trades
- Can hold 3-5 uncorrelated positions
- Proper portfolio diversification possible
Challenges:
- Large positions can move markets (especially in altcoins)
- Slippage becomes significant
- Execution matters more
- Counterparty risk increases
- May exceed exchange insurance limits
- Drop to 0.5% or even 0.25% risk per trade
- Scale into positions over time rather than single entries
- Use limit orders exclusively
- Focus on liquid markets (BTC, ETH, major alts)
- Split across multiple exchanges
- Consider OTC desks for large orders
- Use market depth analysis before sizing
Large account position sizing:
| Account Size |
Max Single Position |
Preferred Risk |
| $100,000 |
$20,000 |
0.5-1% |
| $500,000 |
$50,000 |
0.25-0.5% |
| $1,000,000+ |
$100,000 |
0.25% or less |
Regardless of starting size, the path to growth is the same:
- Start with conservative risk (
0.5-1%)
- Build track record over 100+ trades
- Increase risk slightly if consistently profitable
- Compound gains by increasing position sizes with account growth
- Never increase risk to "make money faster"
The math of compounding:
- 1% gain per trade × 200 trades per year = 639% account growth
- 0.5% gain per trade × 200 trades per year = 171% account growth
Small, consistent gains compound faster than irregular large gains interrupted by blowups. Learn more about this in our compounding trading gains guide and understand sample size requirements for validating your edge.
The numbers are simple. The psychology is not. Most position sizing failures are emotional, not mathematical. Understanding the psychological aspects of position sizing is essential for consistent implementation.
1. Recency Bias — After wins, traders feel invincible and size up. After losses, they might revenge trade with even larger size. Both are emotional responses, not logical ones.
Solution: Use a trading journal and follow mechanical rules regardless of recent results. Track your behavioral biases systematically.
2. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) — "This is THE trade—I can't miss it." This feeling leads to oversizing on impulsive entries.
Solution: Remind yourself that markets offer unlimited opportunities. Missing one trade means nothing over a career.
3. Overconfidence After Analysis — The more research you do, the more confident you feel. But confidence doesn't improve probability. A trade is never a certainty.
Solution: Rate conviction separately from position sizing. Even 10/10 conviction trades get maximum 2% risk.
- Revenge Trading — After a loss, the urge to "win it back" leads to catastrophically large positions.
Solution: Daily loss limits. After 2-3% daily drawdown, stop trading. No exceptions.
Trading discipline means following your rules when emotions scream otherwise—and using AI to improve trading discipline can help. For position sizing, this means:
- Calculate before every trade — No "feel" sizing
- Use the same formula every time — Consistency builds edge
- Never round up — If formula says
0.847 ETH, don't buy 1 ETH
- Accept small position sizes — Some setups justify tiny positions
- Skip trades that don't fit — No setup is worth breaking rules
1. Practice with paper trading — Before risking real money, demonstrate you can follow position sizing rules for 50+ trades in simulation.
2. Start smaller than necessary — When transitioning to real money, use half your calculated position size for the first 20 trades.
3. Review every deviation — If you ever deviate from your sizing rules, document why. Look for patterns in your emotional triggers using an AI trade review tool.
4. Use automated tools — Position size calculators remove the temptation to manually adjust. Use them.
5. Define your "tilt" state — Know what emotional state leads to poor decisions. For most traders, it's:
- After a big win (overconfidence)
- After consecutive losses (desperation)
- When tired or distracted (impaired judgment)
- During FOMO market conditions (fear and greed extremes)
When you notice these states, reduce size or stop trading entirely. Understanding when to stop trading is as important as knowing when to trade.
Professional traders think about position sizing differently than amateurs:
- "How much can I make on this trade?"
- "I'm confident, so I'll size up"
- "I need to make back yesterday's losses"
- "How much can I lose on this trade?"
- "What position size keeps me in the game regardless of outcome?"
- "Today is independent of yesterday—fresh start, same rules"
The difference is survival-oriented thinking. Professionals know their edge only appears over hundreds of trades. Any individual trade is irrelevant—only the process matters. This process-driven approach is what separates amateurs from pros.
Get AI-powered position sizing alerts. Thrive's AI Coach monitors your sizing patterns and alerts you when emotions affect your decisions—before you blow up. Try AI Coach free →
Understanding common mistakes helps you avoid them. Here's an expanded analysis of the most destructive position sizing errors.
-
The error: "I really like this trade, so I'll go bigger."
-
Why it fails: Conviction is irrelevant. Your historical track record is what matters. If your "A+ trades" don't actually perform better than your "B trades," you don't have a basis for sizing them differently.
-
The data reality: Most traders who track find that their high-conviction trades perform no better than average conviction trades. Sometimes worse, because overconfidence leads to holding losers longer.
-
Solution: Use data, not feelings. Track conviction ratings against outcomes. Only size up on conviction if data supports it.
-
The error: Having five positions open, each risking 2%, thinking you have 10% total portfolio risk.
-
Why it fails: If all five positions are altcoins that move together, your actual risk is closer to 10% on a single bet: "altcoins go up."
-
Real example: A trader in 2022 held 2% risk positions in SOL, AVAX, LUNA, FTM, and NEAR. When the market crashed, all five dropped 50%+ together. Their "diversified" 10% risk became a 30%+ drawdown.
-
Solution: Treat correlated positions as partial single positions. Use the correlation-adjusted formula above.
-
The error: Calculating position size without considering whether you can actually execute it.
-
Why it fails: On small-cap altcoins, a $50,000 position might move the market significantly. Your theoretical entry price becomes unachievable, and your theoretical stop becomes a liquidation level as you try to exit.
-
Never trade more than 1-2% of daily volume
-
Check order book depth before sizing
-
Assume slippage of 0.5-2% on altcoins
-
For DeFi, never more than 1% of pool liquidity
-
Solution: Verify liquidity BEFORE calculating final position size. Reduce size if liquidity is thin.
-
The error: Winning trades at 0.5% risk and losing trades at 5% risk.
-
Why it fails: Even with a 70% win rate, this imbalance destroys accounts. You need 10 wins to offset one outsized loss.
-
10 wins at 0.5% risk = +5% to account
-
1 loss at 5% risk = -5% from account
-
Net: 0% despite 91% win rate
-
Solution: Your sizing should be systematic and consistent—not reactive to recent outcomes or emotional states. Same formula, every trade.
-
The error: Using last month's account balance for this month's position sizes.
-
Why it fails: Fixed fractional only works if you actually adjust to your current account balance. If your account grew from $10,000 to $15,000, your 2% risk should grow from $200 to $300. If it drops to $7,000, your risk should drop to $140.
-
Solution: Recalculate position sizes based on current balance before every trade. Automated calculators make this seamless.
-
The error: Calculating position size without accounting for trading costs.
-
Why it fails: A 2% stop loss with 0.2% fees each way (entry + exit) is actually 2.4% risk. Over many trades, this adds up significantly.
- Entry fee: 0.1%
- Exit fee: 0.1%
- Slippage (average): 0.2%
- Total hidden cost: 0.4%
On a 2% stop, real risk = 2.4%, which is 20% more than planned.
- Solution: Add expected fees and slippage to your stop loss distance before calculating position size. Keep track of your actual trading fees and build them into your sizing model.
-
The error: Entering first, then deciding how much to risk.
-
Why it fails: This leads to either moving stops to fit desired risk (bad) or accepting more risk than planned (also bad).
-
Solution: Never enter a trade until position size is calculated and verified against risk parameters.
-
The error: Doubling down on losers ("averaging down") or adding to winners without a plan.
-
Why it fails: Adding to losers without a predetermined plan is the fastest way to blow up. Adding to winners sounds good but can turn winning trades into losses.
-
Solution: Determine complete scaling plan BEFORE entry. If adding to a loser, it should be planned (cost-averaging with limit) not reactive (desperation). Review post-trade analysis to identify if you're prone to this mistake.
-
The error: Treating leverage as an opportunity to take larger positions instead of more capital-efficient ones.
-
Why it fails: 10x leverage doesn't mean 10x position size. It means 10x sensitivity to price moves. Same risk management applies.
-
Solution: Calculate position size as if no leverage exists. Then use leverage only to reduce margin requirement, not to increase exposure.
-
The error: Swing trading with tight stops that can't survive gaps.
-
Why it fails: Crypto markets can move 10%+ overnight. A stop at 2% below entry is meaningless if price opens 8% lower.
-
Solution: For positions held overnight or over weekends, use wider stops (ATR-based) and smaller position sizes accordingly. Understand how session trading affects volatility patterns and adjust your sizing for different trading sessions.
Here's a step-by-step process to implement everything you've learned. Follow this to create your personalized position sizing system.
- Maximum risk per trade: ___% (recommend: 1-2%)
- Maximum total portfolio risk: ___% (recommend: 5-10%)
- Maximum correlated exposure: ___% (recommend: 4-6%)
- Daily loss limit: ___% (recommend: 3-5%)
- Weekly loss limit: ___% (recommend: 6-10%)
Write these down. They are non-negotiable rules.
Define what A+, A, B, and C setups look like for your specific strategy:
A+ Setup criteria (1.5x normal size, max 3%):
- Clear technical setup
- Direction aligned with trend
- Minimum 2:1 R:R
B Setup criteria (0.75x normal size, 1.5%):
- Decent setup, minor issues
- Minimum 1.5:1 R:R
-
Marginal setup, something feels off
-
Still meets minimum criteria
-
D Setup: Skip the trade entirely.
Use our position size calculator or create a spreadsheet with these inputs:
- Current account balance
- Risk percentage
- Entry price
- Stop loss price
And these outputs:
- Position size (units)
- Position value
- Max loss in dollars
- Percentage of daily volume (if applicable)
Before entering any position, verify:
- Position size calculated mathematically
- Resulting portfolio risk under limit
- Liquidity sufficient for position size
- Setup grade assigned
- Stop loss placement based on technicals
- Correlation with existing positions checked
- Trade documented in journal
Define automatic stops on trading activity:
- If down 3%: Stop taking new positions
- If down 5%: Close all speculative positions
- If down 7%: Done for the day, review required
- If down 6%: Reduce position sizes by 50%
- If down 10%: No trading until review complete
Each month, review with your trading analytics:
- Did your graded setups perform as expected?
- Was your average risk consistent?
- Were there trades where sizing cost you money?
- Did you follow all rules?
- What adjustments are needed?
Document findings and adjust parameters based on data.
Make reviews effortless: Thrive generates monthly performance reports automatically, showing exactly where your sizing was consistent and where it deviated. See sample report →
- Share rules with trading partner or mentor
- Use automated tracking to ensure compliance
- Review any rule violations immediately
- Consider penalties for breaking rules (forced break, size reduction)
Theory is one thing. Application is another. Here are detailed case studies showing position sizing in action.
- Account: $50,000
- Default risk: 2%
- Setup grade: A (clear divergence, support, favorable funding)
- Entry: $2,850
- Stop: $2,720 (below support with buffer)
- Trade risk per unit: $130
- Risk amount: $50,000 × 2% = $1,000
- Position size: $1,000 ÷ $130 = 7.69 ETH
- Position value: $21,916 (43.8% of account)
-
Target 1: $3,100 (1.9:1 R:R) - take 33%
-
Target 2: $3,400 (4.2:1 R:R) - take 33%
-
Target 3: Trail with 20 EMA - remaining 34%
-
Result: ETH reached $3,280 before pulling back. All three targets partially hit.
-
Target 1: +$642
-
Target 2: +$1,116
-
Target 3: +$580 (trailed out at $3,150)
-
Total profit: $2,338 (4.7% of account)
-
Lesson: Proper sizing allowed holding through pullbacks without stress.
- Account: $25,000
- Risk for scalps: 0.5%
- Setup grade: B (clear pattern but lower timeframe)
- Entry: $67,200 (breakout confirmation)
- Stop: $66,900 (below flag)
- Trade risk per unit: $300
- Risk amount: $25,000 × 0.5% = $125
- Position size: $125 ÷ $300 = 0.417 BTC
- Position value: $28,000 (using 2x leverage, $14,000 margin)
-
Target: $67,800 (2:1 R:R) - full exit
-
Result: BTC reached $67,650 then reversed. Exited at $67,500.
-
Profit: 0.417 × $300 = $125 (0.5% of account)
-
Lesson: Small size appropriate for lower timeframe, quick target hit.
- Account: $100,000
- Risk for position trades: 1%
- Setup grade: A+ (macro bottom signals, on-chain accumulation)
- Average entry target: $20
- Stop: $12 (cycle invalidation)
- Trade risk per unit: $8
- Risk amount: $100,000 × 1% = $1,000
- Position size: $1,000 ÷ $8 = 125 SOL
- Position value: $2,500
-
Buy 50 SOL at $22
-
Buy 50 SOL at $20
-
Buy 25 SOL at $18
-
Result: SOL bottomed at $19, average entry $20.40. Position held through recovery.
-
Current value (SOL at $95): $11,875
-
Unrealized profit: $9,375 (93.75% of original account)
-
Lesson: Small position size (2.5% of account) appropriate for wide stop and long holding period. Patience with position trading.
- Account: $30,000
- DeFi allocation: 10% of account ($3,000)
- Risk assumption: 50% of DeFi allocation could be lost
-
Entered $3,000 LP position for 150% APY
-
Protocol exploited 3 weeks later
-
Lost entire $3,000 position
-
Account impact: -10% drawdown, painful but survivable
-
Lesson: DeFi position sizing must account for total loss scenarios. This trader's rule (max 10% in high-risk DeFi) saved their account. Always evaluate smart contract risks before sizing DeFi positions.
Want to avoid these mistakes? Thrive tracks your position sizing consistency automatically and flags deviations before they become disasters. Start your free trial →
- Setup: Trader attempting to "make money faster" by increasing trade frequency and size
- Account: $15,000
- Started with: 1% risk per trade, 2-3 trades per day
- Changed to: 3-5% risk per trade, 8-10 trades per day
- Week 1: Up 12% due to luck
- Week 2: Down 25% as variance normalized
- Week 3: Revenge trading at 10% risk, down another 35%
- Total: -48% in 3 weeks
-
At 5% risk per trade, just 5 consecutive losses = -22.6% drawdown
-
At 10% risk per trade, 5 consecutive losses = -41% drawdown
-
Combined with overtrading, they hit maximum pain quickly
-
Account impact: Near-total destruction of trading career confidence
-
Lesson: Position sizing rules exist for a reason. Increasing risk to "make money faster" always ends the same way. Follow your trading routines consistently.
- Account: $40,000
- Entered 5 positions, each at 2% risk
- Total "risk": 10%
- AVAX long: $1,600 position, 2% risk
- SOL long: $1,600 position, 2% risk
- MATIC long: $1,600 position, 2% risk
- LINK long: $1,600 position, 2% risk
- DOT long: $1,600 position, 2% risk
- BTC dropped 15% overnight
- All five positions hit stops simultaneously
- Actual loss: All five correlated, 10% account loss
-
Average correlation: 0.8
-
True portfolio risk was ~7% (not 2%)
-
One market event affected all positions
-
Lesson: Correlation-adjusted sizing is essential. These should have been 1% risk positions each, or fewer total positions.
See your real portfolio risk. Stop guessing at correlation. Thrive shows your true portfolio risk in real-time, accounting for crypto correlations. View portfolio analytics →
The right tools make position sizing effortless. Here are the essential resources:
Our free position size calculator handles all the math:
- Input account size, risk %, entry, and stop
- Outputs exact position size
- Shows position value and leverage requirement
- Validates against portfolio limits
Visit our risk management tools section for:
- Portfolio risk assessment
- Correlation analysis
- Drawdown tracking
- Circuit breaker setup
Explore all crypto trading tools including:
Fixed fractional at 1% is the best starting point for crypto position sizing. It's simple, protects your capital during the learning curve, and teaches discipline before you add complexity. Use this for your first 50-100 trades, then consider more sophisticated methods like Kelly or ATR-based sizing.
Use the formula: Position Size = (Account Size × Risk %) ÷ (Entry Price - Stop Loss). For example, with a $10,000 account risking 2%, entering BTC at $65,000 with stop at $63,000: Position Size = ($10,000 × 0.02) ÷ $2,000 = 0.1 BTC.
The 1% rule means never risking more than 1% of your total account on any single trade. If you have $10,000, your maximum loss per trade should be $100. This ensures survival through inevitable losing streaks.
Reduce size during known volatility events (FOMC, CPI releases, Bitcoin halving) or stay flat entirely. A 2% risk trade can become a 10% loss if the market gaps through your stop. Either size down by 50% or use options for defined risk.
Not necessarily. Volatility-based sizing (ATR method) automatically adjusts for different assets. Alternatively, use tiered sizing: normal size for BTC/ETH, 50% size for mid-caps, 25% size for small-cap altcoins.
Determine your total intended position and risk first. If you plan to scale in over 3 entries, each entry should be 1/3 of your total position. Ensure that your average entry price and full position size still result in acceptable risk when you're done scaling.
Yes, and it should be. Many trading platforms and journals include position sizing calculators. Use our position size calculator to input your parameters once and get exact sizing every time.
The Kelly Criterion calculates mathematically optimal position size based on your win rate and average win/loss ratio. Formula: Kelly % = W - [(1-W)/R]. Most traders use "Half Kelly" (divide result by 2) for more conservative sizing.
Leverage doesn't change how much you SHOULD risk—it changes how much capital you need to take that risk. Calculate position size first based on account risk, then determine margin requirement by dividing position value by leverage.
For most traders, 2% is the absolute maximum per trade. Professional traders often risk 0.5-1%. The lower your risk per trade, the more trades you can survive and the longer your edge has to compound.
Treat correlated positions as partial single positions. If holding 5 altcoin longs that are 80% correlated, your true portfolio risk is much higher than the sum of individual risks. Reduce per-position size or limit total correlated exposure to 5-6%.
Small accounts (under $5,000) may need to risk 2-3% per trade to make positions worthwhile after fees. Focus on capital growth and skill development before optimizing position sizing. Many traders start with paper trading or very small amounts until they've proven consistent edge calculation over 50+ trades.
Monte Carlo simulations run thousands of random trade sequences using your historical win rate and R:R to show the probability distribution of outcomes. They help you understand the range of possible drawdowns with your current position sizing and whether your risk of ruin is acceptable. This is especially useful for validating whether your chosen risk percentage is appropriate for your strategy's characteristics.
Recalculate before every trade based on current account balance. This is the core of fixed fractional position sizing—your sizes automatically adjust as your account grows or shrinks. Using automated trading software that calculates sizing for you ensures you never skip this crucial step.
Day trading can use tighter stops and slightly higher frequency (0.5-1% per trade). Swing trading needs wider stops to survive overnight gaps—use ATR-based stops and correspondingly smaller position sizes.
DeFi positions need additional buffers for slippage (0.5-2%+), gas costs, and MEV. Calculate standard position size, then verify the position is large enough to be profitable after all costs and risks.
Amateur traders ask: "How much should I buy?"
Professional traders ask: "What position size gives me exactly 1.5% risk with my stop at this level?"
It's the same trade. But the professional approach ensures that every trade contributes to a coherent risk management framework, while the amateur approach is basically gambling with extra steps.
Position sizing isn't sexy. It doesn't make good content for social media. Nobody posts their crypto position sizing calculator results.
But it's the unsexy stuff that makes money over time. Master this, and you have a chance. Ignore it, and you're gambling.
Still doing position sizing math manually? Or worse—skipping it because it's tedious?
Thrive's built-in position sizing calculator does the math for you on every trade:
- Input your stop loss — We calculate exact position size based on your risk percentage
- See dollar risk clearly — Know exactly how much you're risking before you click buy
- Portfolio risk monitoring — See total exposure across all open positions in real-time
- Historical sizing analysis — Discover if your sizing has been consistent or all over the place
- AI Coach feedback — Get alerts if you're sizing positions inconsistently or taking on too much risk
Professional traders use systems because systems remove emotion. Thrive is your system for crypto trading signals, risk management, smart money tracking, and disciplined position sizing.
Stop guessing on position sizes. Start calculating them.
→ Get the Position Sizing Calculator
To conclude this comprehensive guide, here are the essential position sizing principles every crypto trader must internalize:
- The Non-Negotiable Rules:
- Never risk more than
1-2% of your account on any single trade
- Always calculate position size BEFORE entering a trade
- Set stop losses based on market structure, not arbitrary percentages
- Adjust sizing for correlation when holding multiple positions
- Reduce size during high-volatility periods and uncertain market conditions
- Use ATR-based sizing to adapt to changing volatility
- Track every trade in your trading journal to verify consistency
- Your job is to survive, not to get rich quick
- Every professional trader has mastered position sizing
- Consistency beats conviction every time
- Small gains compound; large losses destroy
Position sizing is the bridge between having an edge and profiting from it. Master this essential skill completely, and you give yourself the best possible chance at long-term trading success in the cryptocurrency markets.
